Every so often, the entrepreneurial world circles back to a familiar debate: “Do we really need marketing?”
It’s almost charming how persistent this question is. Kind of like asking whether you really need oxygen because technically, you can hold your breath for a bit.
The confusion usually comes from a simple illusion: when marketing is done well, it looks effortless. The messaging feels clear. The visuals feel aligned. The brand feels coherent. Cognitive science calls this the fluency effect, when something is easy to understand, we assume it was easy to create. Spoiler: it wasn’t.
Many founders, especially in early stages, also feel pressured to stay “lean.” Lean is great. Lean is efficient. Lean becomes risky only when it turns into “Let’s skip strategy and hope for the best,” or “Let’s cut costs by hiring someone enthusiastic but inexperienced.” Energy is wonderful. Expertise is what prevents you from spending the next two years fixing the fallout.
A lack of marketing doesn’t usually create a crisis. It creates something subtler: chronic underperformance. You can absolutely run a business without strategy, but what you can’t do is scale effectively. You can’t command premium positioning. You can’t build trust fast. You can’t differentiate in a crowded market. You end up relying on luck, referrals, or being “found” organically, which is not a strategy—it's wishful thinking.
Neuroscience research consistently shows that humans form impressions of competence and trust within milliseconds. Before a single word is read, a visual cue, a tone, or a design choice shapes how we interpret value. Marketing controls that moment. When you ignore it, you’re essentially leaving your first impression to chance.
And when founders finally experience the difference, they rarely ask the question again.
If you need help with that, book your free first session at info@theinmediato.com
.png)
.png)
.png)








.png)





